Skip to main content

Economics, markets and politics

I am always amused when people make comments like; you were wrong the German banks never went bankrupt after the Greek debacle.  Although technically, they are right, the German banks were able to liquidate valuable assets and the EU provided a massive cushion for banks by socializing the bond losses.  Despite the sale of assets and government support the value of German banks halved since 2009.  It's far worse if the benchmark is 2007...

This commmentary is because of an article in yesterday's FT about "foreign investors" going back into China's stock market.  This was given as a reason to be positive about China's economic prospects.  My read is that several hedge funds saw a positive value following the massive correction in the market (Shanghai main index is down 60%, and the average p/e is at 10).  

That was sloppy reporting by the FT (there's more and more of that I find).  The Chinese financial market is in a difficult position; it is an expression of the country's private market economy, but since 1/3rd of the companies listed are real estate adjacent, that problem will have to be addressed first.  

I am not a China bull, especially for foreign capital.  I don't like the risk profile for non-Chinese investors.  But it would be wrong to say that China is facing a terminal decline right now.  BYD continues to do very well, it is now the world's largest electric car manufacturer (by units).  Tesla has higher sales numbers and lots of profits, but in China, this is less important.  Still, BYD is a real success story, and its vehicles (mostly buses) are starting to appear all over the world, including in the UK.  It is also important to note that BYD is the car company that most resembles Tesla -- fully integrated.

As an investor, it is foolish to only consider economic factors in making an investment decision.  Politics often reshapes the game.  A few months ago, some rather important PLA officers "disappeared". Over the past two months, the purge has deepened, and now several dozen high-ranking PLA officers have been removed from their posts.

These purges are based on political factors that we know nothing about (we just know the obvious outcome).  China delayed its Plenium by nearly 3 months -- this is the meeting of all senior bureaucrats to determine how to achieve the goals set by the Congress.  Rumours are that there are no easy fixes and that even delaying the real estate correction is probably impossible.

When nearly 60% of my ex-firm's very wealthy Chinese clients have already activated their "get out of here" plans, you know that things are serious.  What I was told is that the children and the wives have already left the country and have established residence elsewhere.  

As an investor, I have to take all these risks into consideration.  Rebalancing my portfolio is necessary because political risk has risen again (as if the Ukraine war was not enough).  This morning I spent an hour on the phone with my investment manager, following my instructions.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...