Skip to main content

American centric trade policy

The benefit of having a strong and comprehensive trade policy should fill me with dread as a farmer.   Truthfully, the Americans are a useful catalyst to force some long overdue farming reforms in the United Kingdom.   The bucolic idea of the small family farms is ridiculous in the 21st century.  It was mostly ridiculous in the 20th too.   The united Kingdom has created (with Europe) a policy to support the smaller farms as a superior good, against the overwhelming benefit of concentrating on the modern industrial farm.   

There are even Youtube videos of morons cutting hay as in the 15th century, by hand...really.   A good portion of farming in Britain is back breaking low paying jobs.   20 years ago, an American company invented a machine to pick strawberries.   I saw their latest model, it is 10x better than hand picking, more gentle and only picks ripe fruits.  One of thousands of examples.   Robots to muck stalls or even feed the animal. entirely automated milking process, that reduces some stress on the heard.

British farms need to consolidate.  The European union stopped that natural trend in favour of perpetuating poverty.   Yes farmers are conservative, and will often continue to chase a dream long after they should have given up.  The death of the European subsidy is the best thing that ever happened to the farming community.  Marginal players are being consolidated.  the death of the sub 100 acres farm should be welcomed.   It will make food production more cost effective, and be a better allocation of our limited farming resources.  Also lets not forget that labor shortage is a real thing.   

Note:  I know I sound callous about all these tiny farms, but Europe has ossified the natural trend to mechanize farming.   40 years of misguided farming policy is being reversed quickly, and very painfully for some participants.  One good trend is that land prices have been rising, it will make the pain of exiting the business a little easier to swallow (I get the heartache of losing a multigenerational farm...)   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

JD Vance -- Buyer's remorse (update)

Senator Vance like all human beings is a complex person.   He wrote a powerful book that was even turned into an excellent movie.  His "memoir" Hillbilly Elegy talks about a man who grew up in some level of poverty -- not exactly true, but then who cares, it was still an excellent book.    Being the running mate of Donald Trump cannot be easy, first and foremost President Trump is nuts and lazy.  It has been reported from several sources that one of his ideas was to create a 2,000-mile moat between Mexico and the US and fill it with snakes and crocodiles -- -not kidding here!  The bleach against Covid, there was a lot.  Not only has been proven to be ignorant he is also famous for doing absolutely nothing.   Senator Vance brought two things to the ticket Ohio (a swing state) and youth.  He is not 40 yet.   He was a great "anti-age" foil against Biden and to an extent Trump who is not a young man either, at 78.    However, part of the problem is that Senator Vance li

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc