Skip to main content

Egypt's Dilemna

 Egypt had had stable government for nearly 5,000 years.   Until modern communication, the country was completely isolated, with desert on either side and fertile land next to the Nile River.  Over thousands of years, irrigation expanded the possible population where nearly twenty million people could be fed from the land it cultivated.  

Until 1947, the population of Egypt was about twenty million, in 1962 the population of Egypt was still around 20 million.   Infant mortality and war ensured that over 15 years the population hardly grew.  Today Egypt's population stands at 111 million, the building of the Aswan dam allowed a massive increase in the land that was cultivated, and with the help of foreign-purchased fertilizer (100% imported), the country can meet about half its total caloric input.   

Egypt's problem for the past four years was the massive increase in the cost of fertilizer, a good portion of that increase was absorbed by the government, and still the cost of food has exploded.   The invasion of Ukraine by Russia had been terrible, because Egypt is one of the largest importers of grain from Ukraine, and the cost of fertilizers has only risen.   This has led the government, in an economic bind.   The deficit and the foreign debt rise are all coming home to roost at the same time.

Reasonably priced food is the one thing that has maintained social peace, the riots about a decade ago (the Arab Spring) were all about food prices, specifically the cost of Palm oil.  

40 years ago, immigration would have solved Egypt's problem.  Today, the birth rate is high, over 2.62, very much like the rest of Africa, where the average birth rate is over 3 (it's around 1.1 in China and Germany), this means that Africa has the fastest population growth and yet some of the poorest quality agricultural land.  the only excellent land is in southern Africa (Zimbabwe and South Africa) which have their own challenges.  

Egypt today is the poster child for what will happen in a good percentage of Africa (excluding oil-rich Nigeria).   Population growth, poor arable land and the rising cost of fertilizer and foodstuff will lead to riots and civil wars.  

The Western world doesn't care much about Africa, some do matter, but most of the continent is not very productive.   The continent's colonial past has some reason for today's outcome, but at one point the blame has to fall on the elected officials.   It also means that the US will stay away (The French finally left a year ago...)

The question then becomes why am I interested in Egypt?  The answer is that as a largely homogenous population (ethnic and religious) a conflict in Egypt will be the best guide to understand what will happen to the rest of the continent.   Geographically Egypt cannot expand, the security of deserts is also its limitation.  

A tragedy! 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki