Skip to main content

Why our farm has no issue with the town council

 About a year ago, we tried to have a permanently wet part of the farm transformed into a pond area.   It would have been an extensive and expensive project, and would have greatly improved the biodiversity of our area.  We were dedicating nearly 10 acres to the project and up to half a million pounds in costs.  The town council decided to get involved and started to make a fuss, an expensive planning fuss.   So my wife and I killed the project, we had already a full plate.   The reason I raise the issue is that I was approached by some of the members of the council, and was asked when we were going to resubmit the project.   The three that asked the question were some of the most reactionary from the council, any change is bad.   So I simply answered the project was dead.  The three who had blocked the project, and had even threatened to bring Heritage UK involved to "stop the development" were shocked.  The whole conversation got a lot uglier, angry letters were received at the farm, and lawyer's letters were sent, far more polite, but no less cutting, especially when our lawyer used their own words.   

The point of this is to go back to one of the main reason, we expanded our transformation operations far away from the farm.   First, obviously, we were buying businesses so they were where they were!   But more importantly, there is a very small but vocal and powerful lobby in the British countryside that insists everything has to remain as it is.   Secondly, proximity brings no benefits.   

I am no fan of Jeremy Clarkson, but he has done more in the past five years to show the pettiness of local council than almost anyone in the past 50 years.   In replacing the old crumbling farm building on both the old and the new farm, we greatly beautified the countryside, our biodigesters required no special planning approval because we were replacing slurry pits with enclosed dual chamber biodigesters to reduce water pollution.   The only processing on the farm is the cheese and the butter.  Everything else is done away from the farm.   

Today our farmland appears far more bucolic than it did when we purchased the land, and yet we operate with over 150 employees.  Our farm buildings are all made of steel, and despite their large size they simply vanish in the farmland because of their color scheme.  The only building that still stands out is the old cow shed, which will be gone in a year at most, the advent of automatic feeding requires a more modern approach (although the shed is now used by the goats).  

Still, we have no issues with the council because we try to never interact with them.   It is evident that Mr. Clarkson does it on purpose.   We purposfully do not have our own brand for our transformation businesses, but then we have no media peronality running the show.   In his case, the contunual fights with the local council provide for entertaining television.   I watched the first episode of the third series and felt the pain he did of 2022...

Anyway, all our transformation businesses are conducted on industrial estates, 99.99% of our production is sold via the internet on dedicated and specific websites, no where is our farm brand even mentioned.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...