Skip to main content

Why I liked Boeing as a short term investment play

In November 2012 I issued a note to our brokers that the one of the most interesting short-term investment was The Boeing Aircraft Company.  I outline why the all encompasing drive to maxmize profits was the single most important factor in my recommendation.   The second was that Boeing has just announce a massive share buyback program, in total the company was going to spend nearly $20 billion in buying back its own share.   

I disclosed that as an investor it was important to differentiate between good companies and good return companies, and Boeing was doing everything to maximze short term stock prices.   I suggested a 36 to 48 month hold period, as afterward the shortfall of CAPEX would be felt in the company, especially since Airbus had the new A320 family of aicraft which was due out in late 2016.   I was far from the only strategist to recommend the stock, the truth was the company had been clear that its only drive was to see a rise in the price of the stock.   As a strategist it sounded a stupid strategy since the company would see no benefits, it would actually suffer from the cuts in capital expenditure, but as a short term market play.  It was an easy call.   

When I left in 2018, the stock had gone from $70 to nearly $300, market cap had been halved and capital expenditure was hardly larger than it had been five year earlier and they had redeveloped the B737 aicraft, almost like a skunkwork project.   By the end of 2017 our brokers were telling their clients to liqidate their Boeing position, the lemon had been squeeze dry.   

It is possbily the worse trait of the capital market these days, liquidity changes investor's preception of what is important.  If there is limited liquidity investing in a company is a long term decision to create fundamental higher earnings and profit.   

I wrote it black on white that this strategy would harm Boeing's long term earning capacity, but that was not our decision, that was the management, and guess what the management's incentive was entirely driven by share price outpreformance, and not by the quality of their product.   So it took a decade for the damage to be done.  Is it fatal, maybe especially now that Space X is killing it in space.   


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more