Skip to main content

China Banking Transition & Impact

Even in banking China resembles Germany.   Chinese banking has three layers, the big four (or five) aka ICBC, the 45 regional banks, still massive but you have never heard of them, and then thousands of small local banks.

The top ones are well regulated and strong, account for 50% of all assets, and deal almost exclusively with state owned enterpises and the very largest private companies.   The last 4,000 which are poorly capitalized and account for 15% of total bank assets provide mortgages to Chinese people and loans to property developers.  

Their bread and butter new business died five years ago, when the Chinese government created the long overdue real estate correction.  They are being hit on all sides of their balance sheet, which is a consequence of the implosion of the bubble.  In the past, these banks would have been rescued by THE local government where they operated, which would buy the non-performing assets.  That doesn't work anymore, because the state and local governments are broke.   

The new strategy is consolidation.  In the past months 40 of these banks have been merged together.   This too will fail, because if you take 10 bad banks and put them together you still have one bad bank, second the Chinese savers are not idiots, and have already transferred their assets from the small regional banks to the bigger one,  these regional banks will be entirely funded from Loans from the big banks.

All this is done for one reason, delay the inevitable for a few more years. The reasons there are simple there are no upfront costs to mergers, it looks like something is being done, hard decisions can not only be deferred but are someone's responsability.   The immedate impact is that small private company have seen their access to capital fall to zero.   

The lucky trifecta!

Note:  The failure of Chinese banks will not directly affect the Western banking system.   It will further centralize all economic activity in China.   This is the death of private enterprises in China.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

JD Vance -- Buyer's remorse (update)

Senator Vance like all human beings is a complex person.   He wrote a powerful book that was even turned into an excellent movie.  His "memoir" Hillbilly Elegy talks about a man who grew up in some level of poverty -- not exactly true, but then who cares, it was still an excellent book.    Being the running mate of Donald Trump cannot be easy, first and foremost President Trump is nuts and lazy.  It has been reported from several sources that one of his ideas was to create a 2,000-mile moat between Mexico and the US and fill it with snakes and crocodiles -- -not kidding here!  The bleach against Covid, there was a lot.  Not only has been proven to be ignorant he is also famous for doing absolutely nothing.   Senator Vance brought two things to the ticket Ohio (a swing state) and youth.  He is not 40 yet.   He was a great "anti-age" foil against Biden and to an extent Trump who is not a young man either, at 78.    However, part of the problem is that Senator Vance li

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc